Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List |
Date: | Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:10:47 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well, I know this, I have both docs telling me that if I go back to work,
I'll keep injuring myself further in my arms and neck. However, when the doc
just applies the standard from the book. They come up with at the most 45 %
disability and that is assuming that I get a positive on the neck claim. The
standard assumes a AB PERSON. That will not get me off the job. There has
got to be a president of someone who has a disability to start with and
further injuries. I just am in a rock and a hard place unless we have some
sanity and the dock can say "he was only 50 % to start with. I have no one
to really talk to, to come up with a precedent to cite. I do not need to
return to work, but, the doc if limited to the AB standard can not get me
out on disability. Surely I am not the first to be going through this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cleveland, Kyle E. [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:45 PM
To: 'Barber, Kenneth L. '; [log in to unmask] '
Subject: RE: results from mri
What a mess. At least my boss only has to answer to the standard
employment laws and the State of Ohio. Another reason for "states rights",
eh?
-Kyle
-----Original Message-----
From: Barber, Kenneth L.
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: 12/13/02 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: results from mri
well, kyle. cdc is very supportive, but, with the federal government
the
whole government work related illness or injury for the whole government
is
managed by DEPT. OF LABOR. it is that way by law. if each dept ran there
own
program, cdc would have had me out.
|
|
|