BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Roy Nickelson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:33:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
with the thg71 a you still have to use the computer if you need to put in a
pl tone.
Roy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard WEbb" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: KENWOOD TFH6A


> Message-Id:
<20030122153344.RVO25548.imf00bis.bellsouth.net@[209.214.148.122]>
>
> On 2003-01-22 [log in to unmask] said:
>    >I wish someone would make a multiband HT with the features one
>    >really needs (PL-tones and the like) but without such complicated
>    >menus that it takes a Ph.D. to figure them out.  And unlike most on
>    >this list, I suppose, I don't give a hoot what's happening outside
>    >the ham bands except possibly for EMS and WX frequencies.
> YOu and me both MIke!  I also feel that if the only way I can program
> it reliably is with a windows box then it's not usable.  I want to
> deal with computers and cables to program my radio I'll go ahead and
> buy commercial equipment from Motorolla or somebody which is rugged
> such as that used by police and firefighters.  My Kenwood thg-71a
> gives me the features I want and is easy to use, but not quite as
> rugged as I'd like.
>
> I did get to see one of the Icom units at a hamfest last weekend, and
> like the cw output of frequency display idea.  That one's kinda cool.
> WOuld like to have 6 meters and or 220 mhz in the same ht, but for the
> most part use 2 and 70cm the most around here.
>
> WOuld i buy another 71a?  OF what's out there right now probably yes.
> THough it's not as rugged as I'd like it's quite field programmable
> and that's an important part of owning any radio for me.  Get much
> more complex and I'd have to use a computer interface, and if I have
> to go to that much trouble I'd go with the commercial vendors that
> make ruggedized equipment which can stand a little more hard use.
>
> AS they say:  "HOrses for courses."
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard Webb
>
> Electric Spider Productions
>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
>
> --- Benjamin Franklin November 1755
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2