mag, you are right on here.
  i may be conservative, but, i see nothing wrong with
the government being involved in these things as part
of the "general welfare" that the constitution says
should be insured.

--- Magenta Raine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> In a message dated 5/19/03 7:58:07 AM Pacific
> Daylight Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > Believe me, as a bureaucrat, there is much work to
> be done by folks of all
> > stripes of mental and physical ability.
> Meaningful work.  Work that would
> > instill pride and an ethic of social
> responsibility.
> >
>
>  Kyle, this is so true... I dream of a society where
> my skills could be put
> to use for the greater good. Perhaps I could design
> brochures for the govt.
> or I could teach remedial reading and writing...
> perhaps deaf contractors
> could build accessible houses, perhaps people like
> Pam could manage
> apartments for people with disabilities. Anthony
> could design more telecom
> stuff for cingular.  (yes, I got an ad last night
> after I read his email,
> very good stuff, Anthony! And they said in the text
> that their first  ad
> starring our own Dan Kipplinger, had prompted them
> to do more for PWD. Good
> on ya, Dan!)
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> I am available to do writing, editing, reporting,
> designing jobs, including
> business cards, etc. I am also a disability rights
> activist.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com