PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tom Bridgeland <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:05:42 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
"E. McCreery" wrote:

> >i have no idea about small game. being small, they
> >wont affect the overall profile as much as big game. make sense? so >whats
> >the typical profile of  big game?
> So, you have no idea about small game because you deemed them too small to
> be of value in the human diet?

Some small animals have quite  a lot of fat. I ate armadillo
once, it was great, and very greasy. Ducks and geese have
lots of fat too.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2