PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:32:18 +0100
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Organization:
http://freemail.web.de/
From:
Amadeus Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]> schrieb am 14.01.03 12:27:31:

> The extensiveness of the use of cooking technology by paleolithic era
> humans suggests that "raw paleo" may be something of an oxymoron.

Philipp, how do you come to the idea that cooking technology was used "extensive" in the paleolithic era? And even to the point calling the raw !oxymoron"?
Not that I would argue against the early use of fire.
At last I tend to accept the Wrangham fire theories.

But what we have is just few stone herds and redened areas.
Not the slightest indication of the frequency of use for cooking.

In addition:
no cooking pots - meat would loose its fat, strongly limiting its usefulness over a fire
no shure points after which time the ability to *start* a fire arose.

I think raw paleo is the most paleo paleo.

regards

Amadeus





______________________________________________________________________________
Den Komfort von WEB.DE FreeMail nutzen, aber die alten E-Mail-Adressen nicht
aufgeben? Kein Problem: http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021128

ATOM RSS1 RSS2