yes, salman pak, i have wrote "saddam" so much lately that i made that
slip.
  i do not know why they need the plane to teach hijacking, unless it is to
be more reality to the training.

   i do not mind if mag sticks with her cousin, i just do not think she is
going to persuade them. she can always try. it is  her right to do so. it is
a right that has been died for, and a right that the poor iraqi people do
not have at this time.



-----Original Message-----
From: Deri James
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: 3/10/2003 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: Iraq

On Monday 10 Mar 2003 3:23 am, you wrote:
> I do not believe it was our original quest to free the Iraqi people.
>
>
> you are right. the first and most pressing reason was so that the
nobel
> saddam could not give weapons of mass destruction to terrorist.
freeing the
> iraqi people is just a pleasent side effect.
>
> mag, why do you want to blame this country instead of blaming saddam
for
> being allied with terrorist and failing to take one of the 17 last
chances
> that the U.N. has given him?
>
> quiet some time ago i suggested that you put "saddam pak" in a search
> engine and read what comes up. it is a terrorist training camp inside
of
> iraq. a 707 is there for training to hijack airliners. the suggestion
is
> still reccommended.
>
> you probably shoud give up with your cousin.

Do you mean 'salman pak'?

A truly strange story from a person who I assume received 'financial
help'
from the US to defect. What I find strange is why do you need a plane
fuselage to teach someone how to hi-jack a plane without using weapons?
Its
not suggested the plane was used to train pilots or anything of that
sort, or
even if it could fly!!

Stick with your cousins Mag.

Cheers

Deri