PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Swayze <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:43:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
You:  Are a stinker!

-----Original Message-----
From: Paleolithic Eating Support List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim Swayze
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Wine and Stops, now Saturated Fats

Bruce > PROVE that raw milk causes problems

Let's walk through a hypothetical conversation between you and me.

You: Raw milk is good for you.

Me: That's strange since I know that pasteurized milk is not.  Has the
process of pasteurization changed the milk sugars and proteins to cause
it
to be healthy?

You: The Masai thrive on it.

Me: Really?  Some say that certain Indian groups "thrive" on corn.  But
we
know better.  So would the Masai perhaps have been better off without
the
consumption of milk?  Assuming that they are truly healthy, is that so
despite its consumption?  And, hey, wait a minute.  You never answered
my
question about how pasteurization makes a healthy product unhealthy.

You: Raw milk is good for you.

Me: Ok, we'll let the Masai question slide.  How about some proof to
your
claim that it's good for you.

You: Prove it isn't.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2