Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:20:53 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> At the simplest level, food is nothing but the constituency of
> its nutrients.
that is exactelly what analytical thinking lead us to believe
i am scared when i read a statement like that because i need to know that
life is valued . .
.
just imagine a movie where each image have been separated from each other .
now you have all the ingredients and you are asked to understand the movie .
you might see the image of somebody sweating in the middle of a cliff.
In your effort to reconstitute the scene ,you might wonder if this climber
is climbing up and are spending a tremendous amount of energy doing so ,or
he might be in fact going down to the river because it was so hot etc...
i have been told that we know exactelly what is in sea water , all the
minerals can be measured but when human attempt to make sea water respecting
the proportions ,they discover that fishes can't sustain life in it .
I am sad to hear that food have been reduced to its analytical components
( despite the fact that we are far to have discovered all of them ).
life doesnt reduce itself to a human mechanical understanding of it .
can we say that wood is the combinaison of ashes ,some gaz and carbon
because once it is burn it is what we get .
will i give justice to the miracle of life happenning in you when you write
, by reducing yourself to a bunch of muscles , bones and other anedoctic
organs ....
or by reducing yourself at the molecular level ...( you still have to
master all the differents levels of analytical understanding possible to
get a sense of the whole )?
jean-claude
|
|
|