Yup.  It's so statistically significant that there's no way these could be
"chance" traits.

Kyle

-----Original Message-----
From: BG Greer, PhD [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: siblings and parents; was RE: Sterilization


Kyle,

       I am the second of two sons. I was not the "hell raiser", neither was
ny brother. He got married at 17 ( and is still married to tthe same woman).
Older sibling(1st born are you achievers. They set the standard. My bro
retired
20 years ago as a
Senior VP for a "baby Bell". He helped design the baby bell system.

       I am social, gregarious and an achiever. Since Dan left home so early
I was an "only child" for awhile. That's what led me to my achievements.

       When they re-stanndardized the Strong Vocational Interest Blank with
a
standardization sample (over 10,000 subjects), they ask birth order on the
demographic sheet. The results were fascinating and validated Adler's
writing on
birth order. I can't remember what they found for 2nd borns, but their
finding for 1st borns were fascinating.

       Women Ph.D.'s in chemistry 94%
       Astronauts  98%
       Women CEO's 94%

Bobby