Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 07:08:35 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Elizabeth Miller wrote:
>I assume you are burning ketones? Usually ketosis is accompanied by lower
>appetite. If you're gaining weight, I wonder if your gluconeogenesis isn't
>working overtime creating glucose which then triggers insulin to stimulate
>fat storage.
>
Possibly. I have heard the theory that low-carb dieters become more
efficient at gluconeogenesis, making it more difficult to lose regained
weight, the second time around. But this is a controversial and
strictly anecdotal "fact" -- I don't know of any research on the subject.
> Assuming a 90% fat diet consisting of 2600 calories that would
>mean 2340 fat calories -- you should not have gained -- unless you were
>breaking down muscle which then stimulated insulin. Have you kept the 2 lb.
>weight gain.
>
Yes, I'm still wearing the two pounds. And my diet did not stay at 2600
calories. The way my appetite increased, I'm pretty sure it went over
3000 calories. I was eating a *lot* of sour cream, and even resorting
to pure coconut oil. It was a rather strange feeling. Although eating
all that fat was somewhat sickening, I didn't feel satisfied for long,
and within an hour or so I'd be looking for something else to eat.
I may try it again, increasing my carbs to 60g or so, as Amadeus
suggested, but I'm not quite motivated to undertake it yet.
Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|