C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pam Dahl <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
Date:
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:11:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
True to your word, Kyle, I'm one of those coast inhabitants who feels ok
about laws regulating the sale of weapons (though my forbears landed in
Minnesota). While I realize that one who is determined to obtain a gun can,
I think background checks, etc. make more determination necessary and
thereby save lives. Given that a rebellion of armed citizenry would be
quickly squashed in today's America, I have a hard time understanding the
relevance of arguments citing the importance of arms in protecting us from
our government. I'll admit my bias here toward non-violent means of bringing
change. And it's not too late for the vote. ;)

My $.02

Pam

> The difference lies not so much in whether one is "anti" or "pro" gun as
it
> is whether or not we feel comfortable with to nationalizing more and more
> aspects of our lives.  I daresay that the Europeans and, for the most
part,
> individuals who reside on east and west coasts of the United States are
more
> comfortable with the notion of socialization than those of us whose
forbears
> desired to explore the "New World" further inland than Boston or San
> Francisco.
>
> A large element of our U.S. population is dependent upon the State for
their
> most basic of needs.  There is nothing inherently wrong with that.  What
IS
> wrong is when that becomes the desired norm.  With that construct we get
> three basic factions:  The group wishing to be "on the dole", the group
> wishing to "administrate the dole" (and its inherent power) and the third
> group, to which I belong, that maintains that the ideal is for me to take
> care of my own needs, IN AS MUCH AS IS HUMANLY POSSIBLE.  It is to this
> third group that the writers of the American Constitution were directing
> that document.  It is this third group that sees the value of personal
arms
> as a viable defense of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as well
> as understanding that there is a mandate for an armed citizenry to keep a
> government of, by and for the people from becoming a government by fiat
and,
> ultimately, jackboot.
>
> -Kyle
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2