BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 May 2003 08:09:17 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
It's something to think about.  I have a DSP in my receiver.  It might be
interesting to try one on my Dx-398 or Satellit 800.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: clear speech


> Hi Russ,
>
> I find that it is better for removing background garbage, hiss and the
like
> than the dsp in my TS-2000.  It does introduce a little more of the watery
> sound you often get with DSP but not a bad trade off.
>
> Take care and 73.
>
> Kevin, K7RX :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 15:12
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: clear speech
>
>
> How does the Clear Speech compare to the DSP built in to the radio itself?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 10:32 PM
> Subject: Re: clear speech
>
>
> > Hi Howard,
> >
> > I use the base unit as well and am very pleased with it.  I find it
> > certainly does make a difference in background noise levels and yet
> > maintains the voices quite accurately.  Is this what you are also
> > experiencing?
> >
> > Thanks and 73
> >
> > Kevin, K7RX :)
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2