C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: i little tid bit for our discussions
From:
"Barber, Kenneth L." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
Date:
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:41:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
No, not the uk.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: i little tid bit for our discussions

This treaty is still in force, I suppose?  Was it with the UK?

Kat

On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 07:55:59 -0400 "Barber, Kenneth L." <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> With all the discussion of the constitution,
> the articles of confederation
> (pre-constitution) and in general history, do
> any of you know the one state
> that can still legally maintain it own navy?
> The clue is that a treaty
> supersedes the constitution. This fact is one
> reason why there is so much
> scrutiny of treaties in this country.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2