At 18:55 +1000 14/10/02, Phosphor wrote:

>and what other areas of the carcass are these?

Pop down to the butcher and ask him to show you a carcass.
Ask him to take out the organs. The other areas are what's left.


>and the point is what?

The point is that you can't argue that organ meats are high in
saturated fats because clearly they are not.


>no, you're telling lies again.  It's a bad habit. you gave the roo example
>to try to establish that aborigines had access to few sources of fat.  tell
>me again how much fat an emu carries?

Oh no you don't. I'm doing all the searching for figures here.
You are presenting emu as an alternative source of dietary fat.
So you tell me. What's the total carcass breakdown of protein and
fat in an emu?

I bet you a paleo-beer that the figures show something in the order
of 20% protein and 10% fat. I'll even go out on a limb and hypothesize
that the fat profile is *way* less saturated than the full-carcass
profile of kangaroo, beef or red deer; let's guess at S:M:P of 2:2:1.

 ...Richard.

p.s. eggs have more protein than fat and the fat is only 37% saturated.