sorry, scott. i loved the points you made, becose the
things you said do happen too much. i am sorta
disalusioned with the republicans and the democrates
too. you know for many elections, i have voted based
on the question, "which is the lesser evil?"
sorry again for the miffing, that was due to my lack
of communicating exactly what i was thinking.
hey, guys, would any of you run for office if you
thouht you had a chance to win? this is definatly for
every body!!!
--- Scott Sands <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I didn't call you off your argument, Ken. I said
> "whoa." Perhaps there's
> less between the lines than you thought there were.
> You can certainly
> disagree...but "evil" is a loaded word...and I have
> yet to see someone
> accuse Hillary of doing something beyond the scope
> of most politicians.
> Thus most politicians, as a function of their job,
> are evil?
>
> And you made a point of saying Kat's question was
> directed to "Bobby and me"
> and "indirectly to the other guys" on the list. I'm
> sure the women on the
> list are encouraged to respond, too...so that part
> of your response miffed
> me a bit.
>
> Let's all agree to disagree, OK? I certainly didn't
> mean my "whoa" to imply
> that you shouldn't make your point, Ken. I'm
> equally sure your comments
> about where the question was directed weren't meant
> to tell me whether I
> could respond or not. So let's call it a draw and
> move on, neh?
>
> Scott
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 1:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Ironies
>
>
> > wait, i do not mean anyones resonse was not
> welcomed.
> > you can disagree with me as much as you like, all
> i
> > meant was that i can't be called off of a answer i
> > gave as to why i "hate" mrs clinton. that is all i
> > meant to say. i took time to tell you i did agree
> with
> > the point you made. and i do. it allowed me to
> make
> > some observations of the war on terror and the war
> on
> > drugs that i'd not have been able to make had you
> not
> > disagreed. i was though ask to give a reason for
> my
> > feelings about the clintons. i do have equal
> disdain
> > for thethings this administration is doing that i
> > think are not constitutional. an i appreciate your
> > allowing me to agree with you on your point. even
> when
> > a particular person is ask a question, everyone
> has
> > been indirectly ask the same question. did i say
> that?
> > i intended to. maybe i did not. anyway i
> appoligize if
> > you though i was saying you could not express your
> > views. i guess what i was saING WAS THE "WHOA",
> oops
> > as being like "hey, you can't say that".
> > hey, scott, i was thinking about saying
> something
> > that would make all of you get out the flame
> thowers
> > out to me. i wonder if i dare. mag and kat would
> > skewer me but good. i'll comtemplate if i want to
> do
> > that or not.
> > hang in there friend, hit me with anything you
> want,
> > i'll try to respond.
> >
> > but, guys, i must quit for a little time as my
> > hands are giving me signals to stop for a little
> > while. if i respond tomorrow, it will be quick
> enough.
> >
> > --- Scott Sands <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > I wasn't aware that my response was unwelcome.
> > > However, my "whoa" was
> > > directed towards your answering Kat's question
> by
> > > telling us what Margaret
> > > Thatcher DIDN'T do. What has Hillary Clinton
> done
> > > that hasn't been done by
> > > just about any man? THAT was my point. Think
> about
> > > it or don't, but
> > > implying offense that I even
> > > responded...well...sheesh. Calm down?
> > >
> > > I don't hate Hillary Clinton, so I won't pretend
> > > Kat's question was directed
> > > toward me...but I won't pretend I'm not allowed
> to
> > > respond--if it isn't
> > > something she wanted a response on, couldn't she
> > > e-mail you directly about
> > > it? If it's on the post, it's meant for
> everyone.
> > > Right?
> > >
> > > I weighed in, and I apologize if doing so was
> > > inappropriate, but I really
> > > don't think it was. I'm beginning to wonder,
> Ken,
> > > if I'm welcome on the
> > > list.
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 1:10 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Ironies
> > >
> > >
> > > > besides you can't say whoa, when kat ask us
> the
> > > why?
> > > > and i directly answered her question that i
> think
> > > was
> > > > directed to bobby and to me and i guess
> indirectly
> > > the
> > > > rest of the list. she did say "you boys."
> > > >
> > > > lets be honest, mr clinton lied about an
> > > affair,
> > > > but, he did it "under oath". and that is
> perjury
> > > and
> > > > there are men and women in jail for perjury.
> it is
> > > a
> > > > felony.
> > > > but again i agree with your point. as i
> have
> > > > already said. the government is taking too
> much
> > > > liberty with this war on terror, just as they
> have
> > > > taken too much liberty with the war on drugs.
> due
> > > > process is out the window if they catch you
> with
> > > lots
> > > > of cash. they can take it and do it without
> > > proving
> > > > that you did nothing wrong and even if you are
> > > > innocent and never convicted, they can keep
> the
> > > money
> > > > and/or property. jose padea (spelling may be
> > > wrong)
> > > > took into custody for supporting terrorist.
> > > american
> > > > citizen. they have not charged him, they have
> not
> > > let
> > > > him get legal councel. this is very wrong.
> people
> > > have
> > > > been killed by law enforcement that i think
> > > charged
> > > > that they were into the drug business, when in
> > > fact
> > > > the county just wanted the person's property.
> i am
> > > not
> > > > a fan of government run amuc.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- Scott Sands <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > > > > Whoa.
> > > > >
> > > > > First of all, let's be fair about what Bill
> > > Clinton
> > > > > did--he lied about an
> > > > > affair. How many men have done jail time
> for
> > > that?
> > > > > Second, let's be fair
> > > > > about what Hillary Clinton has done--she has
> run
> > > > > campaigns the way
> > > > > politicians have been running them in this
> > > country
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
|
