Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: new world foods
From:
Evelyn McWilliams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:17:36 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Todd Moody wrote:
"Tropical fruits and tubers would have been available.  These are good
sources of starch and sugars.  Yams are native to Africa, and  waterlily
roots are found in many places around the world for example.  Here's an
interesting web page on the use of the latter, by Australian aborigines:"

I wonder, then, why Australian aborigines have higher susceptibility to diseases like diabetes, etc when arguably their diet was always high in sugars and starches?  

Wouldn't they have adapted metabolically to sugars and starches?

Evelyn

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV