Amadeus:
>>>I tend to think so too, but it's always a question of amounts.
>>>Without nets and fishhooks and in dry areas the amounts would have been
>>>very low, I think.
Peter:
>>Does this mean that you are now willing to concede the same point when
>>it comes to plant foods? ;-)
Amadeus:
>Yes. The same thing of course applies to the amounts of particular plants
>which later became a staple. Legumes, cereals.
This applies not only to legumes and cereals but to all edible plants
"individually" as well as plant foods as a category which is why, no matter
what virtues a diet like the one you are eating might have, is way off the
charts in terms of its relevance to paleo.
Amadeus:
>http://www.naturalhub.com/natural_food_guide_meat.htm
>Now only 4 animals are staple and they are even very much
>modified by agrigulture. Previousls... read yourself.
Which is an argument not to reduce intake of animal foods but to expand
variety and to seek out quality of these foods.
Peter