Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: word-meaning and speaker-meaning
From:
Katrina <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 16:37:22 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>The claim that words mean nothing but what speakers intend to
>mean by them is dead wrong.  People sometimes fail to say what
>they mean.

Are you saying that words have an objective meaning?  Why is it then that
two dictionaries can't even agree on a word definition?  What about the
fact that definitions can get altered every year?

>It is also true, however, that some words and expressions are
>polysemic, or ambiguous.  This doesn't entail that they mean just
>anything, or that they mean whatever the speaker wants them to
>mean, but it does entail that they have more than one meaning.
>The word "paleo", as applied to diet, is like that.

The definition of Paleo seems to change constantly according to what I have
read on this list.

Katrina.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV