Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 27 Feb 2002 22:32:00 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> On your other comments, I am going to go do a little rereading of Ray
> tonight. My original understanding was that he advocates the foreign
> protein theory over what I've called a fat/calorie calculus. But I'm not
> so sure that that is the case. Why, then, would he argue for the
> consumption of lean meat and low-sugar fruit to lose weight? I'll bet
he's
> assuming both.
>Ray's claim is that obesity is an immune system disorder. He
>disregards the caloric calculus entirely (see p. 22).
Thank heaven someone's discounting that chunk of bunk. Been there, done that
and know for a fact that it's possible to lose on 'too many' calories and
*gain* on 'too few.' But to listen to the established mode of thought feels
very Alice-in-Wonderland.
I was wondering if anyone had a moment to expand a little (no pun intended)
on what specifically Ray meant by immune system disorder? (I've heard
various theories, am working under some of those assumptions now, which are
making sense.)
CB
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|
|