Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:40:24 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Christy Martin wrote:
> Hi no-milk folks,
> Here's an interesting article from today's Seattle Times about McDonald's and what
> they put in their fries. This explains a couple of choking incidents I've had with
> fried foods such as onion rings and french fries (not at McDonald's). Why I'm able
> to eat yogurt and cheese yet have occasional sudden reactions is still a mystery.
Fine.
Does anyone know who should I write to in MacDonald's (preferrably in Canada) to tell them that, because of their "knowing but not telling" policy, I have lost all faith in their ingredients list and therefore
(a) My family would never set foot in any of their restaurants, and
(b) I would actively advocate that other people do the same.
Our allergist srtessed the importance of total avoidance for having a chance to outgrow the allergy.
If MacDonald's knowingly omitted facts and thus jeopardadised my daughter's health and future well-being, I'd like to hurt them. Bad.
Since acts of personal violence against their management are discouraged by the government, the only legal way that I know to hurt a corporation is through a large and well-publicized class-action suit.
Usually, I'm opposed to those (because, at the end, the only people who benefit are lawyers) but this time it's not about "compensation". I want their collective asses served to them on a platter and I do not care one bit if some shyster gets filthy rich in the process.
Is there a case to be made here?
|
|
|