 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:04:55 +1300 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At the moment their is a bill in the house I think it is gaining co-sponsors
to bring CC and Rs under PRB1 but it doesn't look like it will make it
through committee this session. You can find out more about this on the
ARRL web site. It is popping up their a lot. You could also urge your
representative to become a co-sponsor if they aren't already as ham radio
communication could be very important to the Island in bad storms.
73
Scott
n0hok / zl1chm
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C28168.B540CD20
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I've been lurking on this list for sometime and finally have a question =
> I'd like to throw out for comment.
> Years ago, hamclubs that I belonged to commonly expoused the idea that =
> the FCC had rules that protected hams from undue badgering from =
> communities when ham antennas were put up on private property. The idea =
> was that hams play an important role during civil emergencies.
>
> Throughout the years, I never had a problem with anyone anywhere =
> concerning my antennas although I heard lots of bad stories.
> Finally after 48 years of hamming, I've run into my first problem with a =
> local housing development here in Hawaii. The home owners book on =
> restrictions limit antennas to some CB and VHF antennas. As an HF CW =
> guy, I plan to appeal. =20
> Does anyone have information concerning FCC regulations or other legal =
> decisions that might be used in my argument?
>
> Thanks,
> Larry K6HWT
>
>
> =20
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C28168.B540CD20
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
> http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3314.2100" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hello Everyone,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I've been lurking on this list for =
> sometime and=20
> finally have a question I'd like to throw out for comment.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Years ago, hamclubs that I belonged to =
> commonly=20
> expoused the idea that the FCC had rules that protected hams from undue=20
> badgering from communities when ham antennas were put up on private=20
> property. The idea was that hams play an important role during =
> civil=20
> emergencies.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Throughout the years, I never had a =
> problem with=20
> anyone anywhere concerning my antennas although I heard lots of bad=20
> stories.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Finally after 48 years of hamming, I've =
> run=20
> into my first problem with a local housing development here in=20
> Hawaii. The home owners book on restrictions limit antennas =
> to some=20
> CB and VHF antennas. As an HF CW guy, I plan to=20
> appeal. </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Does anyone have information concerning =
> FCC=20
> regulations or other legal decisions that might be used in my=20
> argument?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Larry K6HWT</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
> size=3D2> =20
> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C28168.B540CD20--
>
|
|
|
