Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:54:04 -0400 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi, I have the same complaint about the THF6A. I have used many antennas
with it, but I am looking for something that is longer then the rubber
duck Has anyone made the HF bands a little bit more sensative, and if so
what have you done? Is there any atenuation on this rig at all, and how
do you adjust it?
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Bob Tinney wrote:
> I have been very happy with my thf6a and the b band receiver
> seems as sensitive and selective as the a band receiver.
> Over the ham bands, both the a and b receivers are as
> sensitive as any rig that I have owned. If you hit the rig
> with a strong signal or use it on a base antenna that is
> broad, I do get overload, but it is no worse and it is
> actually better than other multiband rigs that I have owned.
>
> I have been very happy with my thf6a. My only complaint
> about the rig is the battery design which does not allow
> easy quick charging.
>
> Bob Tinney, K8LR, [log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|