I know that, but gladly htey made some changes or moved the pager site
that was interfereig with the repeater.





On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Mike Freeman wrote:

> Of course, CTCSS by itself won't help with intermod.  What it *does* do
> is to keep said intermod from bringing up the repeater.  If the intermod
> comes on during a QSO, everyone is S O L!
>
> Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> Amateur Radio: K 7 U I J
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:00 PM
> Subject: Re: to use a CTCSS or not to
>
>
> > Well, now that the CTCSS is turned onto a repeater now on 145.330 they
> > don't get any pager intermod like they used to.  Don't know if the
> CTCSS
> > was on then, but I know of repeaters that do have CTCSS tones, but
> they
> > still experience pager intermod problems so maybe the pager site
> wasmoved,
> > and the  CTCSS has been thereall a long.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Brett Winchester wrote:
> >
> > > Unfortunately this method has not really caught on here to prevent =
> > > intermod problems.  Ah well........
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank You!
> > >
> > > BRETT K WINCHESTER  PM  KD7JN
> > >
> > > [log in to unmask]
> > > http://www.icbvi.state.id.us/brochure/RADIO.HTM=20
> > >
> > > VOLUNTEER & READING SERVICES MANAGER
> > > IDAHO COMMISSION f/t BLIND & VISUALLY IMPAIRED - ICBVI
> > > P O BOX 83720
> > > 341 W WASHINGTON=20
> > > BOISE IDAHO  83720-0012
> > >
> > > 208-334-3220 ext 104 +7 =3D voice mail
> > > fax  208-334-2963
> > > Member IAAIS International Association of Audio Information Services
> > >
> > > >>> JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[log in to unmask]> 01/10/02 04:12PM >>>
> > > Well, that leaves you free to make your own choice then, but that
> makes
> > > sense especially with the proximity to Canada that I am in.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Mike Freeman wrote:
> > >
> > > > Some 2-meter repaters (notably, one of those in my area) transmit
> a
> > > > PL-tone all the time.  However, they don't always require an
> incoming
> > > > PL-tone.  A controller will turn the tone requirement on when s/he
> > > > detects interference (intermod or whatever).  In my area,
> interference
> > > > was the principle reason a PL requirement was introduced.  But it
> isn't
> > > > rieogorously enforced.  If you want to access the repeater 24/7 no
> > > > matter what, though, you need the tone on.
> > > >
> > > > Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > Amateur Radio: K 7 U I J
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:42 PM
> > > > Subject: to use a CTCSS or not to
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone, I have had a weird situation come up with a couple
> of
> > > > 2-meter
> > > > > repeaters and 440 repeaters.  Some that claim that you need a
> 100 or
> > > > 107.2
> > > > > Hz PL tone I've been able to access with both the PL and
> without.
> > > > This
> > > > > doesn't make sense if they want to clear out interference.  Has
> anyone
> > > > > else noticed this?  I figure it is either one or the other.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>