BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:57:28 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (102 lines)
Of course, CTCSS by itself won't help with intermod.  What it *does* do
is to keep said intermod from bringing up the repeater.  If the intermod
comes on during a QSO, everyone is S O L!

Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Amateur Radio: K 7 U I J

----- Original Message -----
From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: to use a CTCSS or not to


> Well, now that the CTCSS is turned onto a repeater now on 145.330 they
> don't get any pager intermod like they used to.  Don't know if the
CTCSS
> was on then, but I know of repeaters that do have CTCSS tones, but
they
> still experience pager intermod problems so maybe the pager site
wasmoved,
> and the  CTCSS has been thereall a long.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Brett Winchester wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately this method has not really caught on here to prevent =
> > intermod problems.  Ah well........
> >
> >
> > Thank You!
> >
> > BRETT K WINCHESTER  PM  KD7JN
> >
> > [log in to unmask]
> > http://www.icbvi.state.id.us/brochure/RADIO.HTM=20
> >
> > VOLUNTEER & READING SERVICES MANAGER
> > IDAHO COMMISSION f/t BLIND & VISUALLY IMPAIRED - ICBVI
> > P O BOX 83720
> > 341 W WASHINGTON=20
> > BOISE IDAHO  83720-0012
> >
> > 208-334-3220 ext 104 +7 =3D voice mail
> > fax  208-334-2963
> > Member IAAIS International Association of Audio Information Services
> >
> > >>> JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[log in to unmask]> 01/10/02 04:12PM >>>
> > Well, that leaves you free to make your own choice then, but that
makes
> > sense especially with the proximity to Canada that I am in.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Mike Freeman wrote:
> >
> > > Some 2-meter repaters (notably, one of those in my area) transmit
a
> > > PL-tone all the time.  However, they don't always require an
incoming
> > > PL-tone.  A controller will turn the tone requirement on when s/he
> > > detects interference (intermod or whatever).  In my area,
interference
> > > was the principle reason a PL requirement was introduced.  But it
isn't
> > > rieogorously enforced.  If you want to access the repeater 24/7 no
> > > matter what, though, you need the tone on.
> > >
> > > Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Amateur Radio: K 7 U I J
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:42 PM
> > > Subject: to use a CTCSS or not to
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone, I have had a weird situation come up with a couple
of
> > > 2-meter
> > > > repeaters and 440 repeaters.  Some that claim that you need a
100 or
> > > 107.2
> > > > Hz PL tone I've been able to access with both the PL and
without.
> > > This
> > > > doesn't make sense if they want to clear out interference.  Has
anyone
> > > > else noticed this?  I figure it is either one or the other.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2