BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: radio
From:
Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:03:11 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines) 
Yeah; I'd like a Multi-2000! I know it's thirty-odd-year-old technology
but I'd still like one!

Mike Freeman < K 7 U I J >

On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Brett Winchester wrote:

> Never had a 211 and looking back glad I did not.  Wish I could find a good =
> all mode VHF UHF today but  alas all too expensive and less accessible =
> than older rigs. =20
>
> What say you all mode owners out there?
>
> KD7JN
> >>> Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]> 02/21 10:48 AM >>>
> I think I also had a 211.  Wasn't that the 2 meter rig?  The problem I had
> with both of mine were bad solder connections where they ran nickel plated
> pins through the board.  I also had a couple rm 2 key pads for mine.  That
> step switch the 701 had for changing bands was something else as
> well.    Not sure why my signature line wound up in the middle of the
> message.  Something strange pine is doing..
>
>
> 73s
> Butch      WA0VJR
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2