PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 12 Oct 2002 14:13:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Adrienne Smith wrote:

>Eating LEAN meat does not help me reach satiety -- fatty meat does.  What's
>the point in eating lower calorie lean meat if I need twice as much to feel
>full? The only grass-fed meat I've tried that IS satiating is the Australian
>lamb I buy and that is because it still contains quite a bit of fat.  The
>grass-fed beef I buy is tasty, but NOT satiating because it is so very lean
>-- same goes for ostrich.  I need to add olive oil or goose fat to them.  But
>maybe that's just my own quirk.  Is the taste for fat learned or natural???
>
>

I don't know the answer.  I agree with you that fatty meat tastes
better.  That is why, unlike you, I can eat more of it.  I can devoir 14
ounces of fatty prime rib at Outback Steakhouse without pausing for air.
 I don't think I could eat 14 ounces of lean flank steak.

Here's a theory -- pure conjecture, in fact: Sweets and fatty meats
taste very good, in order to motivate us to go out of our way to get
them.  That motivation is adaptive *in an environment where both are
relatively scarce*.  Perhaps the same applies to salt.  Our enjoyment of
these flavors may simply reflect that in the paleo environment they were
as scarce -- and as valuable -- as diamonds.  I wish I knew.

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2