Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:20:38 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Amadeus Schmidt wrote:
> The real difference is availability.
> Wrangham's tubers would be much easier and more reliable to "hunt" than
> gazelles, I suppose. So that's the argument what's left.
I think that would depend on many factors: location, season, etc.
Remember that tubers are an entire class of plant foods, while
gazelles are only a single type of game animal. When the hunters
don't get a gazelle, they can try for a boar, a turtle, a duck, a
crab, and so forth.
> How did you like my venus of Willendorf as a paleo-DHA-attractiveness
> demonstration?
I leave it to you to present the argument -- that men like big
boobs because they symbolize big brains -- to the academic
community. I think it's an idea whose time has come.
Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|