BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Sender:
"\"Let us not speak foul in folly!\" - ][<en Phollit" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
John Callan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 May 2003 07:15:08 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4--986619503
Reply-To:
"\"Let us not speak foul in folly!\" - ][<en Phollit" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1311 bytes) , text/enriched (1597 bytes)
I wonder if anyone on the list was such a serious adult in 1967 that 
he/she had an interest in NY real estate.  My interest in NYC was 
limited to it being such a great place to go to escape adult 
supervision and there were so many opportunities to annoy adults with 
anonymity once you got there!

(Ohhhh!  That does sound good!  Think I'll go for a visit real soon!)

-jc


On Friday, May 9, 2003, at 06:13  AM, Ralph Walter wrote:

> In a message dated 5/8/2003 10:59:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> Have you seen the ad published in The New York Times in May 1967 by a 
> group of downtown businessmen opposed to the state-sponsored 
> construction of several million sf of office space to be rented on the 
> private market.  It shows the trade center with a jet .... well, I 
> don't have to draw you a picture.  It was in response to this 
> criticism that Leslie Robertson said that the Trade Center had been 
> designed to take the impact of a fully loaded jet.   Sounds like 
> others foresaw it for him -- and he made up a response.  
>
>
>
> Although I read The New York Times now, I didn't read it in May 1967, 
> at least not that I remember.  As for pictures you didn't draw and Mr 
> Robertson's response, I c an state categorically.............uhhhh, 
> errrrrr, mmmmm, well.
>
> Ralph

ATOM RSS1 RSS2