BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:44:34 -0700
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (23 lines)
Concur.

But if their Human Factors engineers would quit designing radios so
complex that one needs a Ph.D. to operate them, we wouldn't need synths
except for freq read-out.  But that won't happen until hams become
disenchanted with bells and whistles and boycott the manufacturers.
Protests of newbies to the contrary notwithstanding, it was a *lot* easier
to operate rigs of thirty years ago and more!

Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >

On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Andy Baracco wrote:

> One must remember that voice syns were not developed by the mainstream radio
> manufacturers for the blind.  They were developed for those who used rigs as
> mobils.  I don't think you would get anywhere prevailing on them to do it so
> that blind folks could use their rigs.  The first thing they would ask would
> be, "How many of such rigs would we sell".
>
> Andy
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2