Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:09:57 +1200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I've said it before and I'll say it again - Norton AntiVirus 2003 is not worth giving house room to. And this is from a previously dedicated Norton supporter.
NAV 2000 was pretty unobtrusive and 2001 wasn't too bad.
2002 was beginning to get a little bit 'in-your-face', but 2003 is a distinct liability. It causes lock-ups and freezes and impairs system performance, regardless of processor speed.
Ian Porter
Computer Guys Inc.
Arrowtown
New Zealand
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: m_sayer_
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] Laptop freezing
Ian, it's strange you should say that about Norton 2003, I had the very same
problem with a system I made which was running Norton 2002 and ME. It kept
freezing and crashing on start up. I ended up uninstallling Norton, and
loading Norman anitvirus instead (a free one). There have been no problems
since, and I've installed the same Norton on lots of other systems before
then and after with no problems at all. Maybe it just didn't like that
system?
Not sure, but I've found that the free one is not too bad after all, and
I've since loaded another free antivirus onto another system with no
problems, just to try them out. The other one is Anti vir. (Both have
regular free updates, which can't be bad.)
It's made me take another look at some of these antivirus companies and how
much they charge for their services.
Time will tell if these two are actually any good or not. Can't be too bad
if they're free though.
Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
Digest mode - visit our web site:
http://freepctech.com/pcbuild.shtml
|
|
|