Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | It's a heck of a world when an all-American boy can't carry a pocketknife! < [log in to unmask]> |
Date: | Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:23:08 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I sent the company an email and asked them what was used as a thinner
for their product. It has been at least a week and they have not
responded. I suggest to bomb them with questions and see if the
response makes sense or not. If no response at all I would have grave
doubts about the organization.
On Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 02:36 PM, Becker, Dan wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: M. P. Edison
>> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: Coating analysis interpretation
>>
>>
>> If the coating is really very hard, then the 150% elongation
>> reported could be suspect. I don't recall seeing any hardness
>> data, however.
>
> This from their web site list...I never thought of "Tensile Strength" as
> a measurement of hardness.
>
> Property Test Method Test Results Benefit
> Evaluated
>
> Tensile ASTM D 2370 451 PSI Hardness or
> Strength
> Toughness
>
> __________________________________________________
> Dan Becker, Exec. Dir. "Oh joy! Rapture! Now
> Raleigh Historic I have a brain!"
> Districts Commission - Scarecrow
> [log in to unmask]
> 919/890-3678
>
> --
> To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
> uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
> <http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
>
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|