BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christopjher Tavener <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
``We've no telephone, and we've stopped opening our mail. You can't imagine how free we" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:21:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I am wondering what you all might think of the following.

At the base of a McKim, Mead and White Building I have a rough granite
foundation wall, partly buried in a hillside, partly exposed, enclosing a
mechanical room. The interior space is unfinished. Originally the exterior
was finished with a lime putty stucco,which had fallen off some of the six
exposed faces of the wall. I proposed removing the rest of the stucco and
replacing it in kind. The contractor has already done a test panel of
replacement lime putty stucco.
The remains of the stucco came off the first three walls easily. The
remainder turn out to be a later replacement portland cement stucco which
remains very well adhered, so much so that the contractor is having a very
hard time removing it and has already sp
ent two days longer on this task
than he intended.
The room is very dry. For that reason I don't think the portland cement
stucco is a problem - its relatively good condition may be due to that, or
partly to the presence of a breathing stucco on 50% of the walls.
I am wondering if it is a good/bad idea to put a lime stucco over the
remains of the portland? Any comments?

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2