Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 3 Sep 2002 07:53:34 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Amadeus Schmidt wrote:
> Annother question is: Is it valid to test lectin activity on red blood
> cells? No food protein should come in contact with red blood cells.
> Normally proteins are digested before they penetrate into the bloodstream.
> So what sense makes it to take some blood drops out of the body, and see if
> they react with a food lectin?
The reason is that cells in the gut lining are also ABO type.
ABO is not a "pure" blood type. Thus, if a lectin agglutinates
blood cells of a certain type, it will agglutinate cells in that
creatures gut lining too. There is research to back D'Adamo's
claim that lectins *do* get into the bloodstream.
Incidentally, meats do have lectins. The question is not whether
a food has lectins or not, but whether those lectins have
deleterious effects if and when they enter the body. Does the
mere fact that a certain lectin agglutinates blood cells of a
certain type mean that this lectin causes health problems? This
is where D'Adamo's picture gets very unclear.
Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|