Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:37:24 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Paul Getty wrote:
> We know, just by the fact
>that grains were domesticated, that wild grains were utilized for a long
>time before domestication and complex processing, by people that were only
>occassionally using them. Ancient peoples could not just start processing
>and domesticating grains out of the clear blue. It would have been a
>process of thousands of years, beginning with wild grains being a small part
>of the diet.
Correct. The evidence is they started gathering them 17,000 years ago, and
started growing them 11,000 years ago. The 17,000 years is still too short
to consider these a Paleolithic food.
Grains cause so many health problems I don't understand why people are
coming up with arguments to justify them in the diet. See Ron Hoggan's book
Dangerous Grains.
Don.
|
|
|