Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:30:18 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I, for one, feal using readers is a pain in the neck! Unfortunately,
Scanners and other electronic technology can't yet totally replace human
reading technology.
It seems a major part of my time and energy when I was in k-through-12 and
college was spent worrying about the availability and reliability of readers
and accesible materials, not to mention trying to correct what I wrote in
print, without seeing it. I never saw anything wonderful about having to
use readers, or having to rely on a slate and stylus and manual typewriter
to prepare notes and papers.
The technology we have today, though more expensive than what was available
in the past, has really made a difference in what we, as print impaired
people, can read and write independently. It is true that reliance on one
technology without alternative backups is a bad idea, and that, as in other
situations, success is ultimately up to the individual.
Mike
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask] In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
|
|
|