BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Sender:
"The listserv troubled by a bad conscience and a good memory." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Leland Torrence <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:27:03 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Reply-To:
"The listserv troubled by a bad conscience and a good memory." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Steve,
    But it lasted the first 100 to 150 years, that seems pretty good.  Plus,
the sand is essentially the same fabric as the original.  I don't think the
original masons did anything special before mixing other than a wash.  Do
you know otherwise?
    We have been using local sands both from rivers and beach for some
twenty years (and the masons fifty to sixty) almost exclusively on granite
or trap rock walls, we then lightly etch the surface to expose the aggregate
for a match.
    I understand the salt issue, but have experienced little evidence that
it has a significant play.  I have noticed a ton of efflorescing on every
brick pointing job at Yale where the sand has been carefully spec.'d.
Thoughts?
Best,
Leland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2