Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:46:22 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'll buy that, sort of. I'm an inveterate, unabashed "girl watcher" and
long smooth lines are very kind to the eye. I diverge from Mr. Morris' line
of thought in one respect: prepubescent girls are as angular in frame as
boys.
We're talking curves, baby. Nature hates a straight line. I gotta agree
with nature on this one! (Bobby, you and I are gonna get flamed so bad that
any hair we might need to otherwise shave is gonna be singed off anyway.)
-Kyle (looking for his Nomex heat-resistant suit)
-----Original Message-----
From: BG Greer, PhD [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:43 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Shaving legs with only one hand
Desmond Morris in his book, "Man Watching", says that Western women do
things
like shaving legs and axillary regions in order to maintain a pre-pubescent
look. That attracts us ol' pervert males!
Bobby
>I dunno, mags. I know a lot of cultures where feminine body hair is fine.
>Lots of folks think we Americans worry too much about abthing and
deodorant,
>too. Still, this WASP finds it hard to get past what he does and does
>not
>find attractive. Of course, if personal appearance is no big deal to
>someone, then who am I to put my parameters on them?
>
|
|
|