Another forward.
Rumor Mill News Agents Forum The Incredible 9-11 Evidence Posted By: faction3
Date: Sunday, 30 March 2003, 3:14 a.m. In Response To: <A HREF="http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=30048">CALLS WERE ALSO
APPARENTLY SCRIPTED</A> (Jedediah_Smith)
> "The Incredible 9-11 Evidence
> We've All been Overlooking" -Leonard Spencer In trying to piece together
> what really happened on September 11, a lot of work has been done — much of
> it useful and interesting — into those 'hijacked' flights for which the
> publicly-available evidence is sketchy and contradictory. There are web
> sites for instance wholly dedicated to investigating the true fate of
> Flight 93 and others that attempt to get a clearer idea of what really
> happened at the Pentagon. Both these incidents however are characterised by
> a pronounced absence of substantive material evidence and it is this, I
> suppose, that raises our suspicions and curiosity.
> There is one flight however that has received insufficient attention and
> this is American Airlines Flight 11, the plane that allegedly crashed into
> WTC1, the North Tower. It was the first of the terrorist attacks that day.
> It has been a big mistake not to subject this flight to the same kind of
> scrutiny as the others because, unlike the others, a very good and
> important piece of documentary evidence of this flight exists in the public
> domain. This is the so-called 'Fireman's Video' and we really haven't
> looked at it closely enough. It really does deserve a second look. The
> story of the 'Fireman's Video' is well known. Two French filmmakers, the
> Naudet Brothers, were in New York on September 11 making a documentary
> about the New York Fire Service. The footage shows that, while filming in
> Canal Street, firemen and crew are distracted by a plane flying low
> overhead. The camera operator instinctively turns his camera towards the
> North Tower and, for little more than a second or so, we get a clear view
> of the plane crashing into the tower. It is a precious, priceless second.
> It is the one-second of video that really makes the sinister Bush junta
> nervous. It really gives them nightmares. They really didn't want a
> professional cameraman to catch that moment on broadcast-quality tape. If
> you've got it on tape I strongly suggest you take another look at it, with
> the pause and frame-forward buttons at the ready. If you don't have it
> taped you can purchase the documentary in which it appears on video and
> DVD. It's called simply '9/11'. When seen at full speed, you might first of
> all think that there isn't a great deal to see. There's half a second or so
> when we see the plane flying through the air then it smashes into the
> tower, creating an explosion and leaving a great gash across the building.
> Notice though that immediately before it hits the building the plane emits
> a brief, bright flash. Notice too that the scar it leaves on the building
> is rather larger than seems appropriate for the size of the aircraft. Now
> pause the sequence at the beginning and advance it frame by frame. Firstly,
> look at the plane. Does that look like a Boeing jet to you? Is its wingspan
> wide enough? Does it have engines attached to its wings? These however are
> but minor details compared with what comes next. Watch carefully what
> happens as the plane approaches and crashes into the tower. I leave you to
> come to your own conclusions about what you see (watch it over and over
> again, backwards and forwards), but I'll tell you what I see. Immediately
> before the plane strikes it fires a missile that blows a hole in the
> building's façade. This is the cause of that brief flash. The plane then
> begins to disappear neatly into this hole, leaving no wing impressions. (A
> plane disappearing into a hole? Where have I heard that before; wasn't
> there something about a plane at the Pentagon?) Just before it disappears
> however it fires two more missiles from somewhere near its tail. One goes
> to the left, one to the right (and up a bit) and it is the blast holes from
> these three separate missiles that form the great gash across the building.
> There's more. Keep an eye on the adjacent east side of the building, which
> is also visible. See how, a few frames into the explosion, a white jet of
> smoke erupts out of the east side at the same level as the plane. The jet
> comes straight out of the wall at right angles to it, not angled in
> accordance with the trajectory of the plane. Also it's just white smoke and
> dust, no orange flames or anything like that. It is clearly a bomb going
> off, creating the gash that appears on the east wall. I know what I am
> describing sounds incredible. I suggest only that you look at the footage
> yourself and come to your own conclusions about what you see. The plane
> that hit the North Tower was not American Airlines Flight 11. It was not a
> Boeing 767. It was a custom-built military plane carrying three missiles
> that created the impression of a plane crash without leaving any wreckage.
> In order for it precisely to strike the correct part of the tower (in line
> with the bomb already planted in the east wall) it must have been flown
> remotely using cruise navigation. I believe a similar plane was used to
> strike the Pentagon. The 'Conspiracy Theorists' have got it dead right this
> time. The true Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93 were indeed substituted with
> other planes when the transponders were switched off. Someone hijacked the
> hijackers to make sure the job was done properly. The 'Fireman's Video' is
> Bush's true smoking gun. It is in the public domain and it is even
> available on DVD. It is probably sitting in the video shelves of thousands
> and thousands of homes across the world. It is vitally important that the
> American people see this video frame by frame so they can make their own
> minds up about what really happened on September 11. There has been a
> silent coup in America but few have noticed yet. The Bush Administration is
> clearly very sinister indeed and God only knows what it has in store for us
> next. There is a clue though in the things of which it accuses Saddam
> Hussein: building and using weapons of mass destruction (nuclear and
> biological) and killing his own people. When Bush describes Saddam he is
> describing himself. We have entered the Age of the Conjurer and it is going
> to be a tricky time. The 9-11 stunt was a huge magic trick and we all
> bought it at first. Magicians can be very convincing. You have to look very
> hard to see the trick and not be fooled. On this occasion slow motion
> exposes the sleight of hand, but remember how the magician works: he can
> make almost anything seem real if he can make his audience look in the
> wrong place at crucial moments. Only the American people can now stop the
> imminent slaughter and the imposition of a global fascist police state, but
> they are currently sleepwalking into their own enslavement. It may already
> be too late. But maybe if enough Americans get out their videos and their
> remote controls (pardon the pun) and take a long hard look at that
> remarkable footage of that plane hitting the North Tower, then an armed and
> outraged middle America might just pull it off. Hah! Just in is this
> priceless piece of evidence — the Fireman's Video in QuickTime, good enough
> to see the action and with frame forward and backward capacity too! More
> Incredible Evidence
> It concerns Flight 175, the jet which hit WTC2, the South Tower. If you
> have copies of the various shots of Flight 175 hitting WTC2 they're worth
> looking at again. In particular there's one bit of footage of this incident
> where the camera is facing the south side of WTC2, the side that took the
> impact. In this footage you can see the plane bank sharply seconds before
> impact and you can also see it actually penetrate the building. If you
> pause the tape just before it strikes you can see that the plane is
> carrying an anomalous device on its right wing, very close to the fuselage.
> It almost looks like a third engine and is connected by tubing to the tail
> section. The video (use your pause and frame forward buttons again) shows
> that, just as the plane's nose strikes the building this device fires a jet
> of flames, a split-second before the explosion starts. I wonder what this
> device can be? The dark stripe down the side is not part of the paintwork
> (check out the United Airlines livery) but the shadow of the device and its
> pipe work. In the last second or two the plane banks so much to the left
> that the sun (to the right of the picture) catches the plane's underside
> and the mystery objects cast shadows. Start perhaps with the silvery 'lump'
> tucked, so to speak, in the plane's right 'armpit'. What is that? Note too
> that if you look closely, what I call the nozzle is not part of the plane's
> own outline but is separate from it. And on the video this nozzle can be
> seen firing a jet of flame, just before it penetrates the building. It's
> interesting to note that the two plane crashes into the two towers were
> very different from one another. The first crash, seen in the Fireman's
> Video, was a rather modest affair. After the initial explosion the smoke
> and flames die down quickly and such flames as there are are reddish in
> color. The second plane on the other hand causes a vast spectacular yellow
> fireball and the resultant fire in the building is much more extensive and
> intense than that caused by the first. Given that both planes were supposed
> to be 767s, were both flying from Boston to the West coast and had both
> been in the air for around 45 minutes before they crashed, this is rather
> strange because they should have both been carrying roughly the same amount
> of fuel. As the Fireman's Video shows, the first plane was not a 767 and it
> fired missiles to create most of the damage. The rather small fireball and
> fire was probably due to the fact that it had very little fuel on board.
> The second plane doesn't fire missiles (well, the world's media was in
> place by then) but the explosion it creates is clearly very fuel-rich
> indeed. There are several eyewitness reports that mention the smell of fuel
> in the air after this plane crashes. I suspect that this plane was
> absolutely full of fuel, a flying fuel-tank, hence the mighty fireball. So
> the object on the right wing is probably an ignition device, triggered just
> as the plane strikes, to ensure that the fuel explodes as required. When
> Flight 175 took off from Boston at 8:13 a.m. it is rather unlikely that
> there was such an ignition device attached to the plane, since it would
> surely have been visible to anyone observing its departure. Therefore the
> plane which hit the South Tower was not the plane which took off from
> Boston. This point has been in more detail elsewhere. The terrorist attacks
> on 9-11 are unique in at least one regard. As far as I can tell they are
> the only terrorist incidents to have been played out right under the noses
> of a waiting media. I believe this was no accident. The incidents were
> timed and sequenced to ensure that this was the case. The first crash
> (which we were most definitely not meant to see) brought the media to the
> WTC and ensured plenty of cameras were trained on the towers in time for
> the next crash around 15 minutes later. So we all see the second crash in
> all its glory, from every conceivable angle. Spectacular isn't it? And of
> course even more cameras were around by the time the towers magnificently
> and apocalyptically collapsed an hour later. I believe that the cinematic
> brilliance of these shots was a major objective of the overall operation.
> Remember how we were practically force-fed these images for two whole days,
> so everyone saw them hundreds of times? This is invaluable propaganda and
> brain-washing. It's important to remember that if there's one thing that
> Americans are really better at doing than anyone else on the planet it's
> making movies. Big, spectacular movies.They understand better than anyone
> the immense potential of the moving image to inform, entertain and suggest.
> Above all they know how to manipulate and guide our emotions through film.
> They use this knowledge and skill whenever they can and I believe 9-11 is
> only the most recent instance. As in the case of Flight 11, video footage
> of Flight 175 again reveals the hand of the magician and the movie maker.
> It seems to me that close examination of these two pieces of video proves
> beyond all reasonable doubt that 9-11 was a sophisticated military
> operation for which only the US itself could be responsible. The evidence
> is irrefutable and would stand up in a court of law. While Bush is in power
> there will be no such court case. What the hell do we do now? #### Note:
> Graphics, Video, & Bibliography in Link
> <A HREF="http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa11.htm">http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa11.htm</A>
> ===========
> "The World Trade Center Demolition
> and the So-Called War on Terrorism" Why of course the people don't want war
> ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the
> policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether
> it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a
> communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be
> brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is
> to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack
> of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." — Hermann Goering, Nazi
> leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II Introduction
> The Official Story: The Twin Towers
> The Official Story: The Pentagon
> What Actually Happened
> Evidence for Explosives in the Twin Towers
> Did the Twin Towers Collapse on Demand?
> The Perpetrators
> The "War on Terrorism"
> Wars for Oil
> The Demise of Liberty
> The U.S.A: a Terrorist State
> The Corruption of the Republic
> Questions About the Events of September 11th
> The American Drive for World Domination
> <A HREF="http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html#what_actually_happened_2">http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html#what_actually_happened_2</A>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|