Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: "The Cattle Rancher Who Won't Eat Meat"
From:
Jim Swayze <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Dec 2001 10:11:43 -0600
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
This may come across as sick (but no more sick that the discussion of bug eating
from last week -- a prejudice I am afraid I will never overcome).  But, on one
level, I am glad to hear that the bodies of these dogs and cats are being used
in pet food.  Not cancerous growths, dog collars, packaging and the like, but
why not use the fat and protein?

Maybe I'm just a little different, but I did not freak out a few years back when
there was talk of kangaroo meat being used in Burger King burgers.  (Which was
probably just a hoax).  But my reaction was, other than possible social taboos,
is there anything inherently unhealthy about eating the meat of a kangaroo?  If
not, then why the big deal?

But back to pet food, what is much, much more harmful for dogs and cats is the
addition of cereal grains.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV