Flipping this around, web site owners could charge isps for the
privelidge of getting access to their potential customers. The only
winners either way are the ad agencies. We could even go to the
metered internet that some have been arguing for over the past
several years. It's been tried but not too successfully partly
because the internet had not enjoyed as much penetration as it does
now. Some change that benefits commercial interests is bound to come
and when it does, it'll hit the consumer hard. What form it will
take or what forms it will take, who knows. Some companies are
exploring charging to have email delivered.
--
Jonnie Apple Seed
With his:
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
On Feb 21, 2006, at 5:05 PM, PETER ALTSCHUL wrote:
Tollbooths on the Internet Highway
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/20/opinion/20mon1.html?hp The New York
Times February 20, 2006
Editorial
When you use the Internet today, your browser glides from one Web
site to another, accessing all destinations with equal ease. That
could change dramatically, however, if Internet service providers are
allowed to tilt the playing field, giving preference to sites that
pay them extra and penalizing those that don't.
The Senate held hearings last week on "network neutrality," the
principle that I.S.P.'s - the businesses like Verizon or Roadrunner
that deliver the Internet to your computer - should not be able to
stack the deck in this way. If the Internet is to remain free, and
freely evolving, it is important that neutrality legislation be passed.
In its current form, Internet service operates in the same
nondiscriminatory way as phone service. When someone calls your home,
the telephone company puts through the call without regard to who is
calling. In the same way, Internet service providers let Web sites
operated by eBay, CNN or any other company send information to you on
an equal footing. But perhaps not for long. It has occurred to the
service providers that the Web sites their users visit could be a
rich new revenue source. Why not charge eBay a fee for using the
Internet connection to conduct its commerce, or ask Google to pay
when customers download a video? A Verizon Communications executive
recently sent a scare through cyberspace when he said at a
telecommunications conference, as The Washington Post reported, that
Google "is enjoying a free lunch" that ought to be going to providers
like Verizon.
The solution, as far as the I.S.P.'s are concerned, could be what
some critics are calling "access tiering," different levels of access
for different sites, based on ability and willingness to pay. Giants
like Walmart.com could get very fast connections, while little-guy
sites might have to settle for the information superhighway
equivalent of a one-lane, pothole-strewn road. Since many companies
that own I.S.P.'s, like Time Warner, are also in the business of
selling online content, they could give themselves an unfair
advantage over their competition.
If access tiering takes hold, the Internet providers, rather than
consumers, could become the driving force in how the Internet
evolves. Those corporations' profit-driven choices, rather than
users' choices, would determine which sites and methodologies succeed
and fail. They also might be able to stifle promising innovations,
like Internet telephony, that compete with their own business interests.
Most Americans have little or no choice of broadband I.S.P.'s, so
they would have few options if those providers shifted away from
neutrality. Congress should protect access to the Internet in its
current form. Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, says he intends
to introduce an Internet neutrality bill, which would prohibit
I.S.P.'s from favoring content providers that paid them fees, or from
giving priority to their own content.
Some I.S.P.'s are phone and cable companies that make large campaign
contributions, and are used to getting their way in Washington. But
Americans feel strongly about an open and free Internet. Net
neutrality is an issue where the public interest can and should trump
the special interests.
* Copyright 2006The New York Times Company
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask] In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask] In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
|