Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: canned fish/fresh fish
From:
Tom Barber <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Mar 2002 07:24:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
>>Tom Bridgeland wrote: I read somewhere once that some scientist measured
the mercury in fish before the industrial age (I don't recall how) and found
no difference.

Back in 1972 the state of New York issued a warning about mercury
contamination in the food fish caught in Lake Champlain. They (If I remember
correctly) banned the eating of some species and recommended limitations on
others. A few years later they rescinded everything. Seems that newer more
sensitive tests were skewing the data. When they tested dinosaur bones at
the Museum of Natural History they found high concentrations of mercury.

Tom Barber

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV