Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: population
From:
Tom Barber <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 17:00:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Population control of any sort is not open for discussion here in the US, at
least not open to serious discussion at any level politically. Ecologically,
it is the root cause of all other problems, such as deforestation, species
loss, trash disposal, waste disposal, food production, and so on.

Here in Vermont, a state that takes great pride in its environmental
reputation, there is unchecked growth, and land-use planning of a serious
nature does not exist. In New York State there are some great land-use
planning laws in some areas, but they are under constant attack by those who
would see land as only useful if developed.

Our scientific knowledge about the effects of overpopulation is mitigated by
religious, social and cultural beliefs in the right of a couple to decide
for themselves just how many children they will have.

I do not think we will see her in the US any form of overt population
control (other than imigration control) in my lifetime. The birth rate here,
by the way, has just recently gone back over the 2.0 level considered to be
"zero population growth." That we keep living longer makes this an
inaccurate mathmatical function.

Tom Barber

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV