PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ingrid Bauer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:19:02 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
-----

<A
HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1282000/1282222.stm">
Click here: BBC News | SCI/TECH | Organic apples tickle tastebuds</A>

<But they noted that organic farming systems were "less efficient, pose
greater health risks and produce half the yields of conventional farming". >

i will be curious to know what are those heath risks, considering that most
of  the organic farmers in France  switched to organic because of ther
health problems related to the use of pesticides in the field.
At the time  you din't go organic because it was profitable but because you
had too.
For the efficiency:    by weight it is true because most of conventional
produce have oedema. by solid content and nutrition value it will be worth
comparing , by investment cost  and environmental long term impact  it could
be interesting .
Chemical farming is efficient for the banks not the farmers.
jean-claude

ATOM RSS1 RSS2