In a message dated 1/1/02 3:38:36 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> It's commonly known as the world court.  The mining of a Nicaraguan habour
> was actually an illegal use of force, not just illegal.  With the "USA-AOK"
> blinkers removed, it's not a big leap to equate illegally mining the major
> harbour of a country as part of an illegal blockade (remember, civilians
> were the main users, Nicaragua not exactly being known for its naval might)
> with international terrorism.
>
>

You can make as many propaganda motivated "leaps" as you like in an attempt
to extrapolate what was, into what was not.  In the meantime, thank you for
verifying the split decisions.  And thank you again because when you
attempted to escalate a verdict of violating international law into one of
international terrorism you also indirectly verified that America was not
found guilty of terrorism by the court.
Yours,
Issodhos