BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Russell Schermer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Russell Schermer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:26:25 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Back in the early '80s I had a Hamarlund HQ 145.  It was my first
communications receiver.  I remember it had a lot of dials and made
some squawking noises.  I didn't know how to fix it and I sold it when
I upgraded to a sony ICF-6700W.  Now I have a Kenwood R5000.  I sure
appreciate modern technology.On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 08:47:58 -0700, Mike
Freeman wrote:

>You have the 170 and 180 reversed.  The latter was general-coverage.
>
>Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
>Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >
>
>On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Butch Bussen wrote:
>
>> As I recall the hamarlund models, they were...  hq100 general coverage.
>> Its look a like but ham bands, 160 through 6 meters, I have one of these,
>> was the hq110.  I think the hq170 was the general coverage of the next
>> model up and the 180 the ham version of this one.  I may not remember
>> these right, but sure about the 100 and 110.
>> 73s
>> Butch Bussen
>> wa0vjr
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2