PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: mass confusion
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:35:05 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (12 lines) 
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jim Swayze wrote:
> Again, once
> the fish has met that caloric threshold, other considerations than caloric
> density come into play.

Okay, that makes sense.  Now how does that translate into support
for the claim that sweet potatoes or other tubers would have been
a marginal (i.e., non-preferred) food?

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2