NO-MILK Archives

Milk/Casein/Lactose-Free List

NO-MILK@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Feblowitz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milk/Casein/Lactose-Free List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:51:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Outgrowing an allergy (especially a food allergy)  happens. And it 
happens often. Often enough that many doctors think it's the standard 
course of events. They've seen enough cases where early reactions 
disappear later. It is such a widespread phenomenon that it's viewed 
as an almost certainty. And it's held up as hope when doctors can do 
nothing about the worry and anxiety that parents feel as they try to 
safely raise their allergic children.

Outgrowing is statistical, not absolute. There are always a few 
people - referred to as "the allergic 2%" - for which the 
conventional wisdom doesn't hold. For these, the allergies may never 
go away, or may get worse, or may get better only to get worse later.

Trouble is, it's very hard to predict who's in the allergic 2%. Most 
of us think that the severity of the reaction means that the child 
*must* be one of those. But there are some, I understand, who truly 
do outgrow their reactivity. It's always safest to assume that they 
will not, and to re-test periodically. If the tests show no 
reactivity, a controlled oral challenge at a doctor's office or a 
hospital is something to consider trying. Even then, there's risk. 
Some reactions are so severe that the patient - your child or spouse 
- cannot be brought back from it. So the oral challenge has to be 
done with highly competent medical supervision, and when it's 
believed to be lower risk and worth it.

Another trouble is that a lack of observable reaction is not 
necessarily a lack of reaction. There may be "sub-clinical" reactions 
that are either mild enough not to be visible, or that are internal 
and not visible, or take some other form (as in behavioral changes). 
When you add back a  food and see no reaction, but you see a pattern 
of, e.g., worsening asthma, hay fever, bacterial sinusitis, etc., it 
may be because the allergen is inflaming the airways, sinuses, etc., 
in a way that make you more susceptible to these conditions. So an 
apparently trouble-free reintroduction may not be trouble-free.

And yet-another trouble is a temporary respite from symptoms, e.g., 
during puberty, with a resurgence later.

Complicated territory.

Mark

ATOM RSS1 RSS2