Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:25:11 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well, the subject apparently changed with out the subject line changing,
which radio are you asking about and what's a good price? the T90A is
$229.99 new right now, and the TM-G707A is 269.95 I believe new, as far as
used goes, I've never heard of either one for sale used around here believe
it or not. I guess everyone likes them.
John Miller N1UMJ
Owner: J E M Racing need sponsors and crew help
to chat with me AOL instant messenger JEMracing3
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan, Kevin" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: Kenwood TMG-707A
> Anyone know where there is one of these available for a good price?
>
> Kevin Nathan, Independent Living Coordinator
> Dept. of Services for the Blind
> 3411 S. Alaska
> Seattle, Wa 98118
> Voice: (206) 721-6450
> Cell: (206) 604-4767
> Toll Free: (800) 552-7103
> Fax: (206) 721-6403
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John miller [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 05:38 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Kenwood TMG-707A
>
>
> I went to www.icanworkthisthing.com and got the manual and quick guide for
> mine and they seem to help, I'll let you know when the radio gets here in
a
> couple hours, but it seems very straight forward to me. I'm excited.
> John Miller N1UMJ
> Owner: J E M Racing need sponsors and crew help
> to chat with me AOL instant messenger JEMracing3
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Shaker" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:26 AM
> Subject: Re: Kenwood TMG-707A
>
>
> > While you're at it--smile--can anyone direct me to info on the ICt90
which
> I
> > have had for a couple of days and have not been able to do anything
except
> > turn it on and hear strange noises. I know there has been created a
place
> > where manuals are available on line; but unfortunately I failed to keep
> it.
> >
> > Jim
|
|
|