Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: PALEOFOOD Digest - 28 May 2002 to 29 May 2002 - Special issue (#2002-255)
From:
Jim Swayze <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 May 2002 11:13:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Todd > ...we can point to populations with very low rates of heart disease
whose intake of foreign proteins is nevertheless high (e.g., Masai).

I don't think the Masai are a good example.  The Masai traditional diet
contains only one non-paleo component: milk.   And I suspect that the milk
from natural, free range, grass eating (rather than the milk from modern
grain fed, hormone injected) cattle, while not paleo, might be a lesser
offending non-paleo food.  I'd put grains as the biggest sources of foreign
proteins, with natural cow's milk somewhere down the list.   Do you have a
population where the ingestion of grains is high yet the rates of heart
disease is low?

And perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't find your conclusion that
foreign proteins don't influence heart disease rates the least bit obvious.

Thanks.

Jim

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV