Thank you Chuck.

I was thinking about a CC Radio, but the only person that says anything good
about it is:

Art Bell.

I'll take a 2010 any day.

Also, I have a G E super radio 2 and, I like it.

What is the difference between the GE2 & GE3?

And, don't forget about the YACHTBOY 400.  I own one and its right up there
with the 2010.

73 DE ANTHONY W2AJV
[log in to unmask]


----- Original Message -----
From: "chuck lunkley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:53 PM
Subject: gesuperadio


> I have owned 3 sangean radios and 6 ge super radios.  I realise that much
> of the preferences between the two is based on personal opinion.  I have
> owned ge super radios for the last 25 years and the circuity has not
> changed appreciably.  Why change something that is already good?  I have
> taken apart the ge and examined the componets and have compared
performance
> and construction with the sangean cc radio.
> 1.  I prefer the fine direct tunning charactericts of the analog ge and it
> is constructed with ganged capacitance tunning.  This affords great
> selectivity.
>      The cc radio is typical of most pll tunning recvrs.  The shut out
> threshold tends to drop very weak stations.
>
> 2.  The price of the ge is a third of the cc radio.  When they advertise
> the cc radio as much as they do it is built into the price.
> 3.  The ge does not have the feel or appearance of a slick modern rcvr,
but
> it is burly and durible.  The cc radio has problems in this respect.
> 4.  The built in ac conversion in the ge is so much more convinent than
the
> outboard adapter of the sangean.
>      These are just a few of my observations for what they are worth.
> Thanks Chuck, ki6hk


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com